Do you think that onomatopoeia indicates a non—arb

正确答案：Whether onomatopoeia indicates a non-arbitrary relationship between form and meaning has always been controversial．And it is the last straw for both natural and conventional schools．There are facts to be showed：firstlydifferences of onomatopoeia of the same thing among different languages never go beyond recognition by different speakersat least vowels are there to overlap and make proper match．Secondlyin the course of using languages by humansarbitrariness showed its facility and magic and miracle to humans and won more and more frequency over limited and primitive sounds of onomatopoeia．They proceed forward to signs proper．Thirdlyhuman language never really developed in the direction of imitation of natural sounds but arbitrary and analogical references．Therefore．vowels were reduced or added or modified to cater for social change rather than sound imitationas a result of which onomatopoeia among different languages sound more and more alike．Lastly but not the leastanthropocentric tendency results in a grave illusion：add sounds that do not exist by animals． Look at the following onomatopoeias： (1)creak(2)bang(3)cuckoo(4)bleat A close examination of(1)and(2)tells how ridiculous it is!A door can produce the noise such as／k／and／b／!And another close listening to(3)and(4)reveals that there are no such consonants as／k／and b／or ending sounds as／t／produced by birds or goats!They are just human imaginations．Otherwise animals or inanimate things would be able to combine sounds of consonants and vowels． 拟声词是否表明了形式与意义之间一种非任意的关系这一直是个有争议的问题。这也是自然派与惯例派坚持的最后堡垒与依据所以关系重大。首先虽然不同的语言对于相同感受的自然界中的噪音或声音的拟声词呈现不同程度的差异但不会相差到面目全非或一点相像都没有至少元音部分有重叠；第二人类在使用语言的过程中越来越感到其任意性的便利与魅力以至于逐渐远离并最终摆脱了原始的极其有限的拟声方式彻底向着符号前进；第三人类语言的演变从来就不以拟声方式为根基而是任意与类推所以语言的元音的演变也从不去关照发拟声词所需要的合适音而是始终朝着社会需求方向发展。因此随着音变的不断演化不同语言的拟声词的发音越来越相近。最后也是最重要的是人类的自向性使我们犯了一个极其严重的错误：添加了动物原本没有的音!请看以下四例拟声词：(1)creak：很久没上油的门打开时发出的声音；(2)bang：突然发出的大声响；(3)cuckoo：布谷鸟的叫声；(4)bleat：绵羊、山羊或小牛发出的声音。细看例(1)和例(2)无论如何弄不懂当一扇门“吱呀”开时或突然弄出巨响时怎么会冒出／k／与／b／那些辅音的?再细看例(3)和例(4)据录音观察诸如布谷的鸟类或山羊的蹄类动物根本不能发出辅音／k／、／b／或／t／的只能发元音否则它们就具备了人类的语言可以组合!
Whetheronomatopoeiaindicatesanon-arbitraryrelationshipbetweenformandmeaninghasalwaysbeencontroversial．Anditisthelaststrawforbothnaturalandconventionalschools．Therearefactstobeshowed：firstly,differencesofonomatopoeiaofthesamethingamongdifferentlanguagesnevergobeyondrecognitionbydifferentspeakers,atleastvowelsaretheretooverlapandmakepropermatch．Secondly,inthecourseofusinglanguagesbyhumans,arbitrarinessshoweditsfacilityandmagicandmiracletohumansandwonmoreandmorefrequencyoverlimitedandprimitivesoundsofonomatopoeia．Theyproceedforwardtosignsproper．Thirdly,humanlanguageneverreallydevelopedinthedirectionofimitationofnaturalsoundsbutarbitraryandanalogicalreferences．Therefore．vowelswerereducedoraddedormodifiedtocaterforsocialchangeratherthansoundimitation,asaresultofwhichonomatopoeiaamongdifferentlanguagessoundmoreandmorealike．Lastlybutnottheleast,anthropocentrictendencyresultsinagraveillusion：addsoundsthatdonotexistbyanimals．Lookatthefollowingonomatopoeias：(1)creak(2)bang(3)cuckoo(4)bleatAcloseexaminationof(1)and(2)tellshowridiculousitis!Adoorcanproducethenoisesuchas／k／and／b／!Andanothercloselisteningto(3)and(4)revealsthattherearenosuchconsonantsas／k／andb／orendingsoundsas／t／producedbybirdsorgoats!Theyarejusthumanimaginations．Otherwiseanimalsorinanimatethingswouldbeabletocombinesoundsofconsonantsandvowels．拟声词是否表明了形式与意义之间一种非任意的关系,这一直是个有争议的问题。这也是自然派与惯例派坚持的最后堡垒与依据,所以关系重大。首先,虽然不同的语言对于相同感受的自然界中的噪音或声音的拟声词呈现不同程度的差异,但不会相差到面目全非或一点相像都没有,至少元音部分有重叠；第二,人类在使用语言的过程中,越来越感到其任意性的便利与魅力,以至于逐渐远离并最终摆脱了原始的极其有限的拟声方式,彻底向着符号前进；第三,人类语言的演变从来就不以拟声方式为根基,而是任意与类推,所以,语言的元音的演变也从不去关照发拟声词所需要的合适音,而是始终朝着社会需求方向发展。因此,随着音变的不断演化,不同语言的拟声词的发音越来越相近。最后也是最重要的是,人类的自向性使我们犯了一个极其严重的错误：添加了动物原本没有的音!请看以下四例拟声词：(1)creak：很久没上油的门打开时发出的声音；(2)bang：突然发出的大声响；(3)cuckoo：布谷鸟的叫声；(4)bleat：绵羊、山羊或小牛发出的声音。细看例(1)和例(2),无论如何弄不懂当一扇门“吱呀”开时,或突然弄出巨响时,怎么会冒出／k／与／b／那些辅音的?再细看例(3)和例(4),据录音观察,诸如布谷的鸟类或山羊的蹄类动物,根本不能发出辅音／k／、／b／或／t／的,只能发元音,否则它们就具备了人类的语言,可以组合!